If you were a marketer, it’s likely that social influence of your customers would be interesting to you, and one way of looking for it could be having a gander on Klout. Klout is an online system that analyses a person’s influence across various social networking sites and then rates them on a scale of 1-100, labeling them as ‘influential’ about certain topics or subjects. It seems that marketers are attempting to use these scores in order to market to specific people, in the hope they will then go off and influence others about their products or services.
An article from Chorus and Echo talks about a new scheme, or trend that’s being seen – that those deemed to have high Klout scores get preferential treatment when they visit specific nightclubs. And there’s likely to be more of this kind of treatment in future. Forbes has reported Genesys, a contact centre software solution company in the US will begin to integrate Klout scores into its software. This effectively means that those deemed to have high Klout scores (and therefore more ‘influence’ over people), are likely to get routed to customer service agents more quickly, and experience a more efficient service.
So, what’s the big deal? People who have more influence get better stuff, and the company gains loyalty and more followers as the influencers tell everyone about the amazing service they’ve been getting. As Colin Shaw from Beyond Philosophy states, we already pay celebrities to endorse product placement, and marketers are already looking at social influence in any way they can as a value indicator… (Think number of Twitter followers.) It’s win/win surely?
Although it sounds good on paper… I have a problem with this concept. My Klout score is 41. (41 what?) To give you an idea of how unreliable Klout is: Although it thinks I’m influential about Smartphones, User Experience Design and Gluten-Free… Somewhat true perhaps… It also thinks I’m influential about Masters Golf Tournament and Coffee. Of which neither I can stand, and actually don’t ever recall mentioning? Would people from Kenco think I’m a safe bet and try and sell me some coffee? Because clearly they’re not going to get anywhere. More importantly, is there any evidence that people with high Klout scores really influence anyone at all? I do accept, however, that it may get better with time. To be fair to Klout, it only has access to my Twitter account. Perhaps if it had access to other social media accounts, and I was a little more liberal in my information giving practices, it might know more about me and therefore be more accurate. But I’m not about to give away more of my details to find out.
The other thing that bothers me about it, is that even if you really are influential about something… There’s no way of knowing if it’s in a positive or negative way. And even if you did, you could be negatively influential about Rihanna, or positively influential about Disease. What does that even mean? And is the type of sentiment likely to affect how you treat these influential people as a marketer? There’s no doubt in my mind that there is a return on investment available if you can calculate the potential social influence of those you sell products to. Real social influence. But my biggest issue with this model is this: What about if you could buy your influence score to get preferential treatment? We know that some people accumulate fake Twitter followers to look more prestigious, and this could be affecting Klout already. Additionally, we have some issues with marketers wanting to buy exposure to Facebook users, and controversy arising after reports that up to 8% of accounts are fake… So they’re effectively marketing to people that don’t exist. What if you were real…. But your Klout score was not?
A new addition of ‘Moments’ in Klout tries to explain exactly how people are influential about subjects and how they are being influenced. It hasn’t come available for me yet, but Bob Thompson talks about it in one of his posts on Customer Think. It’s possible that a feature such as this might give more insight to marketers about how influential people really are, and just who they might influence.